As with any technical task, carpet cleaning requires the right tools. And one of the most important tools is a vacuum, The question is, which one should I chose for my building? There are so many different types, and they can result in many different outcomes. A recent study from the Queensland University of Technology in Australia found, that certain models of vacuum cleaners can actually be detrimental to people’s health, by drawing in fine particulates and bacteria from the carpet and release them into the air, where they are inhaled. In general the researchers suggested that older cheaper vacuums tend to be worse in this regards than newer ones. There are other considerations that also deserve merit. Being light maneuverable can help cleaners get into tight spots. It also easier on the employee; allowing them to work for longer at higher work rates.
For residential buildings janitors, we generally see two types of vacuums: Backpack and Upright.
Backpack
Advantages:
More maneuverability:
Easier to move around and carry because of carrying it on your back (at 8 lbs)
Also easier to deploy the power cord.
Quieter as the body tends to absorb some of the noise.
Disadvantages.
Lacks a beater that can get more dirt out of a carpet.
Longer distance for the air to travel can mean less power.
The position of the backpack complicates matters:
-Take time to put on and take off.
-Can be more difficult to carry all the attachments.
-Can be difficult to change bags
Upright vacuum
Advantages
Short distance between the motor and the intake that means less power is lost.
Beater included that allows for the agitation of carpet fivers
Can carry multiple attachments
Easier to change bags.
Option of Canister, paper bag or Bag:
Larger bags (but fills it up quicker.)
Canister is easier to clean.
Disadvantages
Bag can be difficult to clean.
Heavier and difficult to maneuver
Stairs are extremely difficult to clean with.
Often cannot clean corners properly due to the beater.
Louder due to the beater.
There are relative advantages to each, but it really boils down to a question of efficiency. While having an upright brought in every day would leave the carpet extremely clean, it would take up far too much of the cleaner’s time and leave other tasks incomplete. The best of both worlds on carpeted area is to use the backpack for day to day work, then have the upright brought in periodically, just to get the dirt deep down out. In almost all of our buildings we clean the building in this way.
Performance Cleaning is when you hire a professional strata janitorial company to clean your residential building a certain number of agreed upon times per week. You agree you pay them a set sum for a clean building (A task list you agree to). Hourly Cleaning is paying a contractor for a set amount of hours per visit per week.
See the difference? With hourly cleaning the cleaner could not have enough time on some service calls to complete all the items. On some days finish all the tasks early and have nothing to do.
Essentially the difference is: the strata is paying for a set number of hours per week, hopeful the building will be kept up. Or, they pay to perform irrespective of the hours.
Each approach are better suited for different situations and needs. For most cases, a performance cleaning contract is a better option. Its a win-win for both the client and the company. The service provider can now pay the cleaners per visit and not by the hour with the understanding they are responsible for the result and not the time on the clock. For the client, the reality is that the building will not always be in the same condition in regards to cleanliness. Therefore, on some days the cleaners will be on site less time and some days it will require more time. If, for example there were a lot of move ins, there was a big party in the common room, or some occupants brought the party into the common areas, etc.
So how does a cleaning company establish the price for the customer with a performance? Simple. We look at the layout and the items to be cleaned and we calculate the average amount of time per visit. This is done based on experience and unit rates, such as how many square feet can be vacuumed in an hour, or how long it takes to clean a lobby, etc. For instance, if it is a commercial space like a restaurant that needs extensive cleaning, the respective company that offers janitorial services may have extensive restaurant supply inventory already in place with them. With the necessary expertise and experience, they would be able to get to the nooks and corners of the premise and clean them thoroughly.
The alternative, hourly clean, is most suited for situations where some level of caretaker services are required. Some buildings, due to size or strata set-up, require an individual who can assist with the building’s operation. Part daytime cleaner, part onsite caretaker, hourly janitors help to smooth a location’s operation. Areas of service they may provide include, organizing trades, reprogramming of fobs, and accepting mail. Basically hourly contracts mean that the company will ensure someone is at the location to help facilitate the build’s business.
Keep in mind when working out what type of cleaning service you want; there is a difference between hiring a cleaning service, a cleaning service combined with caretaker services, or a caretaker. We offer all of the above options for service; the right service always depends on the building.
Every 6 months at ServiceMaster Clean Residential we ask the property managers we work with for feedback. Some of the results of this survey are listed below. (Names have been removed to respect privacy).
“Very prompt, friendly and accommodating service!”
“the problem solving spirit, great communication/reporting as well as a good understanding of our (Property Managers)’ pains”
“people are easy to deal with and if there are any problems there is someone able to help and make it right!”
“The savings by implementing the scheduled maintenance and preventative programs”
“On Time, Professional and booking done for the whole Year.”
“I like the promptness and the attitude of your employees, respectful and hardworking.”
“Easy to schedule, show up on time, finish the job on time. Few complaints from Residents during/after service. Return no questions asked to review areas which may be deficient.”
“reliable workers, fast response, excellent service, and willing to come back and adjust if needed. Thank you Service Master!”
“You are not binding clients to long term contracts with difficult escape clauses. You want the quality of your work to stand on its merits in order to ensure repeat customers.”
We greatly appreciate the feedback!
False: If Ladder Stand Offs Are Not Used, Gutters Will Be Damaged.
(applies to cleaning gutters, windows,
and dryer vents)
If you are willing to take a moment to read the information below and peruse the photos provided, you will see my explanation regarding the common misconception that in order to avoid damage to buildings, a ladder must have standoffs at the head of it.
This is completely false. Here is why.
Damage is done to building facades or gutters through improper ladder use occurs in 1 of 2 ways.
1. Impact. This typically occurs when an in experienced technician is moving a ladder and either loses control, letting it fall against the building or gutters. A ladder should also never be bounced up and sideways to move it along the building. The weight combined with movement and speed cause dents and damage. This is avoided by having experienced professionals on staff who know how to handle the weight of a ladder properly. Note – this can happen with stand offs on the end of the ladder or not.
2. Angle. Too much pressure against a flimsy gutter can cause damage as well, but that pressure applied depends upon the ladder the angle is placed at. More on angle below.
When a ladder is put up against a building, a worker is leaning a large metal leaver against the building façade. Upon this lever he is placing a large amount of weight – his or her body weight. The amount of pressure against the building façade has to do with the angle of the lever. Whether the ladder has stand offs on the end of it or not is completely besides the point; a ladder with standoffs in the hands of an untrained or inexperienced worker can do just as much damage to the building façade if it is not used correctly. This is because all you have done is put a fancy end on the end of your lever. Rather than have two points of contact being the head of the ladder, you have two points of contact further spread out in the arms of the ladder stand offs. If this is improperly placed against the wall, gutter, or roof, then weight on the ladder or stand offs will cause damage.
When used correctly, a ladder takes most of the weight of the worker and this weight travels down through the length of the ladder and into the ground. A minimal amount of weight presses forward. The further one goes up the ladder, the further the weight on the ladder shifts, eventually putting more stress forward, but not enough to do damage. An experienced worker cleaning gutters or performing any other similar service, will increase the angle of the ladder if they know they are working right at the top of the ladder, thereby increasing the amount of weight going downward to the ground rather than forward against the building.
If used incorrectly, a ladder placed at too steep an angle pushes the ladder forward into the building. This can indeed cause damage, but it is also very likely to cause the feet of the ladder to slip out from under the worker, causing a fall.
Why Use Ladder Stand Offs?
When a ladder is placed against a building and work is being done at the top of the ladder, a worker finds him or herself right up against the building. This creates a very awkward working situation, in which the worker often has to lean backward in order to perform whatever duties they are trying to do. The ladder stand offs allow the head of the ladder to stay about a foot away from the building façade, allowing them to do the work without having their cheek pressed into the building, or having them twist or turn awkwardly trying to do their job. For an example, see the picture below: if the fellow cleaning his windows had that ladder against the brick, he would be right up against the window, making his job quite awkward.
Here’s another great use for ladder stand offs – they can allow you to work around windows you ordinarily couldn’t.
Here is a scenario where stand offs can actually be a hazard. In the pic below, we can see an example of how it can be difficult to tell if the weight of the ladder is resting on the gutter, or on the stand offs on the roof.
If you give an inexperienced worker stand offs and tell them this will protect the gutters, and they then put the angle of the ladder too steep, the point where the ladder crosses over the gutter can and will take the weight of the worker as they climb up the ladder. Damage can be done, once again based on ladder angle. Thinking that the stand offs will take all the weight can lead to scenarios where a steeper angle is used, but the ladder is actually resting on the gutter not the stand offs.
My preference: have an experienced worker perform the service who knows how to use ladders correctly with or without stand offs, and knows how to ensure no damage is done either way. If a homeowner wants to use stand offs to protect their gutters, that makes more sense to me – they don’t climb ladders full time for a living, and may not know or be comfortable with placing ladder on the correct angles, moving a ladder without potentially dropping it, etc.
Q?: But there’s all these great pictures and opinions on the internet about how stand offs protect gutters! Moe, you must be wrong. How do you know?
I performed gutter cleaning, siding cleaning, and window cleaning for years in the field before taking a position as an account manager for ServiceMaster Clean Residential. I know from firsthand experience what I’m talking about. Am I arguing against ladder stand offs? No, not necessarily. Like any tool, they must be used properly to do the job that they are designed for, and they are not a 1 step solution to a challenge. If used incorrectly, they can actually cause damage to the roof, building siding, or gutter system.
Having ladder stand offs doesn’t mean damage can’t or won’t be done to a building or its gutter system – and inversely, not having them on doesn’t mean damage must have been done. The difference is in the skill and experience of the worker.
At ServiceMaster Clean Residential, we have very experienced technicians in the field, with our two lead ladder workers having 18+ and 12+ years respectively. All of our workers are trained, experienced, and care; that’s how we make sure no damage is done during the performance of our services.
Gutter Cleaning – This Means War
We talk strategy regarding scheduling your gutter cleaning. Pre-emptive strike, the full scale ‘storm the beach’ attack, or a customized plan to defeat the onslaught of rain this fall and winter.
Gutter cleaning.
It’s like a war, and although I don’t usually like talking in war metaphors, for the sake of this article, I’m settling in the trenches for some real, honest talk about the yearly battle against the onslaught of rain, and the efforts made by your strata’s gutter systems to keep it contained and flowing away from your building’s properly. After all, you don’t want it spilling over and digging trenches at the foundation, or attacking the decks and entrance ways of the units.
If it does, you’ll be sure to hear screaming from those unit owners on the front line.
So, let’s take a look at how we traditionally approach this, and what works and what doesn’t. After all, if you want to achieve success, it is better to have the proper plan in place to win the battle.
Standard Service – 1 X Cleaning
“Storm the Beach”
Usually, this doesn’t work well.
A one time gutter clean is like throwing all of your resources at the battlefront at one time, hoping to eliminate all possible enemies you’re combating and win the war in one rush. The problem with this strategy is that the enemy is fighting a 12 month battle.
Issues With The Plan:
Timing
If the timing is off, this is pretty much guaranteed not to work. For gutter cleaning, this means if your strike doesn’t happen once the majority of leaves that may fall and plug the gutters haven’t happened, your efforts may be defeated in the near future by more leaves falling and filling the gutters. Too late, and water in the gutter troughs may freeze, not only making it nearly impossible to pull the leaves and debris out, but expanding the trough and potentially causing damage due to the excess weight, and swelling on the joints which damages caulking.
Reserves
If there is anything being held back, your efforts will be defeated. If we picture the trees as the enemy, they don’t all drop their leaves at once; different species shed at different rates and temperatures, and pine trees shed their needles year round.
To gutters, that means if there are any leaves left on the trees waiting to fall, there are potential clogs that may happen once the service is complete. That is why it could be a good idea to call someone similar to Phoenix Arborist who can remove the tree–Remove The Cause , The Effect Will Be Automatically Gone!
Instead of cleaning the gutter every time a leaf falls from the tree, consider opting for a better strategy (maybe something like removing the tree)!
Honestly, isn’t it time for a new battle plan?
Counter with your own reserves & strategy
Gutter Cleaning Program Care
This is why our gutter cleaning program was created. To win this war, we have changed the strategy to maximize the success rate.
Our plan; clean the entire system. However, have in reserve the ability to call in pre-paid and agreed to additional spot cleans to deal with those new problems that arise. Ever see a war movie where those in the trenches are begging the guy with the radio back pack to call in an air strike to come to the rescue?
This is your air strike – And we give you three of them with the program.
(We can adjust and have more than 3 where we think certain buildings will need them)
We also provide minor repair work to ensure the system is maintained, and can give you photo reports of any issues found. You see, we want you to win this war, and if you choose to recruit us, we want to help put the best, most effective strategy to win in place.
That’s why we have our technicians waiting to rush back in and solve problems as they arise at stratas on a gutter maintenance program. Those that see the value of this battle plan can have us swiftly strike the areas and eradicate the issues, getting the system running smoothly again, and working with the strata to win the war; without strata needing to worry about the cost.
Isn’t it expense?
Not really. We typically add only a small amount, less than one service call, on to the cost of a regular one time gutter clean. (Typical added cost for a program vs one time is $ 200.00 to $400.00)
So why isn’t everyone doing this?
Good Question
Timing Of The First Attack:
Schedule the first attack of the gutter cleaning based on your strata’s needs ahead of the start of the war. Don’t play the waiting game, study the enemy so you know the nature of its’ attack, and plan accordingly.
RECCOMENDED CLEANING TIME
Foliage Above Gutter System
Low Early Fall (Sept, Oct)
Medium Mid Fall (Oct, Nov)
High Late Fall Winter (Dec, Jan)
Extreme * Early Fall and Late Winter
* Some buildings require two cleaning services due to high amount of foliage, and varying type of species which shed through out the year.
If there aren’t many trees able to send leaves down into your gutters, then most likely the accumulation that has happened throughout the year can be removed prior to the start of the heavy rains. Booking your service early in the season ensures it gets done before service providers are swamped and the strata is left waiting until late in the war, as the troops are engaged elsewhere. You want to avoid the freezing problem – get the cleaning done early.
However, on the other end of the spectrum, if there are a lot of trees, especially of different species poised to plug up your system, it is better to wait until later so that as many of those leaves have come down as possible.
This is no guarantee of success, but the odds are more in your favour.
So based on results we’ve all seen year after year, isn’t it better to have a more robust battle plan? Don’t expect to win the war with one rush, but consider a measured, calculated, repeat approach that will eradicate the enemy over time; consider a program.
Window cleaning. All buildings require it, it happens at least once per year, and the service gets done with everyone hoping for one thing: no complaints.
However, no matter who you hire or how they clean the windows, there are bound to be people who just aren’t happy with something. So it is in everyone’s best interest to work together to see what the issue is, solve it quickly, and leave everyone feeling good about the service.
Unfortunately, the biggest impediment is often getting the three parties involved to co-operate in the process to solve these problems smoothly and efficiently.
1) Clear communication about the problem between the resident, property manager, contractor.
2) Identifying the problem. The contractor must figure out where the issue is and what precisely is causing the complaint.
This involves either
A) See from inside the suite, or
B) identify through markers on the glass (Stickie notes, etc).
Ideally both A & B are involved.
3) Re-Clean the glazing, or report necessary fixes required to property manager to resolve the issue.
Part 1) Communication about the problem.
“Strata is not happy with the service.”
This is great to communicate that a problem exists, but not what the issue is. Why is the strata unhappy? Most times, I then receive more specific information. For example:
“Unit 709’s bedroom window is still dirty. It must have been missed.”
This is a large assumption.
Consider for a moment; what is this actually telling me? There is a resident who is unhappy with the clarity of their vision when looking through their bedroom window — and they live in unit 709.
This is enough to prompt the contractor to take action to resolve the issue, but leads us to our next and often biggest challenge – where is it?
Part 2) Find the problem.
Using the picture below as a reference, perhaps you can engage in an exercise we are often asked to undertake. In this example, where is unit 709, and where is their bedroom window?
What if their bedroom has several windows?
Better yet, what if we were asked to find a problem with unit 1503’s living room window? If we were told to count up from the ground, is there a 13th floor with the way the floors are numbered. Is the 1st floor on the ground floor, or the second? Each living room in this example seems to have several windows, and which pane or panes of glass have an issue?
Further to communicating that there is a problem, we now have to find the glazing with the reported issue from outside the building. There are no unit numbers outside, so unless there is some identifier we are dealing with a ‘best guess’ scenario. For this reason, we ask for 2 things: to meet with the resident to both identify the problem (more on that below), but also to figure out where on the building the issue is and what it looks like.
If someone cannot meet us to show us from inside their suite where this is, we ask that a stickie note or piece of paper be put up on the inside surface of the glass so we have a visual clue as to what to look for from outside.
A visual marker gives the contractor something to look for, allowing the worker to set up ropes or access to exactly the right spot, and address the pane of glass with the reported issue.
Now’s we’ve found the area with the issue.
Step 3) Re-clean the glazing, or report fixes necessary to the property manager.
If we have gotten to this step, we can clean the exterior surface of the glass again.
But what if the cause of the complaint isn’t actually related to window cleaning? What if this problem can’t be solved by cleaning the outside of the glass with soap and water?
Glass is glass. We look through it, usually not at it. If our focus moves from the view looking through it to looking at the glass, then there is a problem. People consider their view through their windows right after a window cleaning service is performed. If they look through clear glass with no impediments, they usually are happy. If something impairs their view, the usual instant response is: something’s wrong. Therefore the windows must not have been cleaned correctly. Therefore I must complain and get this corrected, it is the window cleaners fault.
In many cases, this assumption is correct. Mistakes can be made, windows can be missed during a cleaning service, and sometimes a window cleaner going back to fix this oversight or mistake is the quick and easy answer. The problem is, in many other cases, there is more to it than that.
This is where it gets challenging, and why the process must exist.
What is actually the problem? This is the primary reason we ask to see the issue from inside the suite. It allows us to speak with the resident, and to see the issue from their point of view.
Problems Encountered – New Windows
-scratches in the glass hidden under the dirt, revealed when windows are cleaned. Often from construction process.
-construction materials hidden under the dirt, revealed when cleaned: silicone, paint spatter, concrete spatter, glue from protective blue plastic, etc.
-bits of blue plastic still stuck to corners of windows not having been removed properly during the construction clean
Problems Encountered – Old Windows
-glass ‘running’ (with certain types of very old glass, vision will be distorted as it will eventually begin to flow downward. Granted, that could take 30-40 years, but it isn’t something that can be corrected with cleaning)
-broken window seals between panes of glass leading to: condensation between glass panes, mold between glass panes, dirt, etc.
-mineral deposit staining (minerals from concrete and other building structure leached out by rainwater, deposited upon glass, leaving a milky film that grows steadily more visible – unable to be removed without chemicals and razors).
-cracks, holes, bubbles: these have been found in old glazing, and cannot be removed with soap and water.
Misc. Common Issues – Not Valid
-dirt on the inside (look through the glass and the view still looks dirty after the service, often times the inside surface of the glass needs to be cleaned, often difficult to tell especially if the window is difficult to reach)
-not included in the agreed-upon scope of work (window is accessible to resident, and strata didn’t agree to pay to have those windows included in the scope)
-spider web nests in the corner of the windows. (spider web is still there, so my window must have been cleaned. Strange logic; especially when the glazing is clean. Spiders can rebuild their webs within 24 hrs.)
-a bird defecated on the window again (is there a nest on the building above this unit? Is there a bird defecating on it every other day? The contactor is only obligated to clean it once, they can’t come back once a week to address a recurring soiling issue as part of the scope)
Misc. Common Issues – Valid
-‘blips’ or squeegee marks: these can be hard to see when doing the job
-dirty water running down over the glass after service is complete
-window missed, still dirty on the outside.
To read about a nightmare window cleaning issue which caused me to change my approach to dealing with window cleaning complaints or deficiencies, you can click here to read that. I hope this helps demonstrate some of the challenges present in dealing with these issues as they arise for the contractor. There often isn’t one simple answer, and just going back and cleaning the glass again can lead to frustration on all sides if that doesn’t address the problem. So everyone understanding and engaging in the process – to get great results – benefits everyone, and should be encouraged by all.
True Story: Several years ago, I received a request from a property manager to address a window cleaning complaint for a resident in a strata. She was quite upset that her windows were still dirty; complaining that the work was not done well, there were still streaks and marks from the squeegee.
Wanting to ensure we did a good job and had satisfied customers, I told the worker about the complaint, and informed him he would have to go back, set up his ropes, and re-clean this lady’s living room window.
Now this worker did excellent work. We rarely got complaints when he did a job, but it happens to everyone eventually, so I figured it was just his time. Being a great guy and willing to stand behind the quality of his work, he took a few hours out of his day, met the building manager to get access to the roof, dragged up his ropes and bosun chair, and re-cleaned the window.
The next day, I got another phone call from the tenant. She was furious. The window cleaning was still not done right! She insisted we do it again.
At this point, I politely requested I visit her suite to see the issue from the inside. I let her know this would help me determine what the issue was, we would know what to look for when going back again, and we could all learn something from the situation. She flatly denied me, stating she was too busy, her time was valuable, it was not her problem if my people were incompetent, and so why should she waste any time out of her day. We needed to do this again.
Wow.
Okay.
I phoned my worker, explained there was still an issue. He wanted to make sure that he had cleaned the right window. He explained that he took his time, made sure there were no drips or marks, the window should look fine. Knowing the quality of his work, I believed him.
This was where I made my mistake.
I sent him back again. I apologized, I sided with the customer, I pleaded customer service quality, and so on and so on.
So he went back. He re-cleaned the window again. This was the third time this window had been cleaned, and the second instance where he had to take a few hours out of his day – at his cost – to do this.
He wasn’t making money while he was going back to fix ‘mistakes’. We were concerned because we wanted to be sure the company looked good for the customers, and had an interest in repeat business with the strata. We wanted to ensure this went well.
But it didn’t. This lady’s next few phone calls were even more abrasive. She was furious, often shouting at me on the phone.
I tried my best to keep my cool.
We cleaned the window again. I insisted this would be the last unless we saw the issue from inside her suite. She still refused, and continued to send communications to the strata and property manager about what a horrible company we were.
My worker quit weeks later. He was very frustrated. I hadn’t stood up for him enough, which, I suppose, is true. But before he did, I managed to insist with this tenant that we would not be back for a 5th time unless she showed us this concern from the inside.
Why, she demanded?
I explained yet again, it could be a blown window seal causing problems, or mineral deposit staining, or dirt on the inside surface of the glass.
Well, she was really mad that I would insult her intelligence by thinking it might be dirt on the inside. She would know that! She has checked for that! She went on and on about how this was our fault and we were just sloppy workers and didn’t know how to do our job. But finally she agreed to let me see this from inside, because, as she insisted, she was not crazy.
So I went to her building, and took the worker who had performed the work with me. We said hello politely to her, standing there with her hands on her hips. Her irate husband stood, arms crossed, glaring threateningly at us as we entered the room.
“See!” She exclaimed. “Right there! And there!” She was pointing to some drips and dirty smudges on the glass on the upper right side of the window over her couch.
I took my chamois, walked up to the couch, stood on it, used the cloth and wiped away the dirt from the inside surface of the glass.
“Let’s go.” I told my worker.
We left.
I had sent a guy back to re-clean that window four times after the original service. I’d been screamed at, belittled, threatened with loss of future work, had the company name smeared, and on and on, all because this person would not check the inside surface of her glass for dirt.
That is why I insist on following the process. (Re-clean from outside no more than once unless we go inside to investigate).
She wasn’t crazy, she insisted! She would know if it was dirt on the inside!
Weeks and weeks of communication, frustration, everyone getting angry, everyone wasting time.
This incident is why I insist on the process of investigation for deficiencies being followed. I will only every ask a person to go back and re-clean a window once if we haven’t seen it from inside the suite. If there is still an issue, seeing from inside is mandatory.
In the years that have followed, I have found through investigating from inside the suite, several of the following issues:
-Dirty glass inside
-tape on the inside surface of glass (from someone putting up Christmas cards or decorations or something)
-Blown window seal allowing condensation between panes of glass
-Blown window seal with black mold spots between panes of glass
-paint specks on the inside of the glass from someone repainting their room
-legitimate complaints.
If we can’t check, we just don’t know what is really going on.